Hypothesis Testing
HYPOTHESIS TESTING TASK FOR INDIVIDUAL BLOG
For this assignment, you will use the DOE experimental data
that your practical team have collected both for FULL Factorial and FRACTIONAL
Factorial.
DOE PRACTICAL TEAM MEMBERS (fill
this according to your DOE practical):
1. Darius (Iron Man)
2. Uzair (Thor)
3. Dorson (Captain America)
4. Person D (Black Widow)
5. Person E (Hulk)
6. Person F (Hawkeye)
Data collected for FULL factorial design using
CATAPULT A (fill this according to your DOE practical result)
Data collected for FRACTIONAL factorial design using
CATAPULT B (fill this according to your DOE practical result):
Iron Man will use Run #2 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#2
from FULL factorial.
Thor will use Run #3 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#3
from FULL factorial.
Captain America will use Run #5 from FRACTIONAL factorial and
Run#5 from FULL factorial.
Black Widow will use Run #8 from FRACTIONAL factorial and
Run#8 from FULL factorial.
Hulk will use Run #3 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#3
from FULL factorial.
USE
THIS TEMPLATE TABLE and fill all the blanks
The QUESTION |
The catapult (the ones that were used in the DOE practical)
manufacturer needs to determine the consistency of the products they have manufactured.
Therefore they want to determine whether CATAPULT A produces the same flying
distance of projectile as that of CATAPULT B. |
Scope of the
test |
The human factor is
assumed to be negligible. Therefore different user will not have any effect
on the flying distance of projectile. Flying distance for
catapult A and catapult B is collected using the factors below: Arm length = 32(+) , 26.7(-)cm Start angle = 19(+) 2(-) degree Stop angle = 90(+) 55(-) degree |
Step 1: State the
statistical Hypotheses: |
State the null hypothesis
(H0): The distance produced by
the projectile from Catapult A is the same distance produced by the projectile
from Catapult B A=B State the alternative
hypothesis (H1): The distance produced by the projectile from Catapult A is
different from the distance produced by the projectile from Catapult B A ≠ B |
Step 2: Formulate an
analysis plan. |
Sample size is 8 Therefore
t-test will be used. Since the sign of H1
is ≠ , a left/two/right tailed test is used. Significance level (α) used in this test is 5% |
Step 3: Calculate the
test statistic |
State the mean and
standard deviation of sample catapult A: Mean: 100.8, standard
deviation: 10.20 State the mean and
standard deviation of sample catapult B: Mean: 89.6 standard deviation:4.47 Compute the value of the
test statistic (t): |
Step 4: Make a
decision based on result |
Type of test (check one
only) 1. Left-tailed test: [ __
] Critical value tα = - ______ 2. Right-tailed test: [ __ ] Critical value tα = ______ 3. Two-tailed test: [ _tick_ ] Critical value tα/2 = ±2.145___ Use the t-distribution table to determine the critical value of tα or tα/2 Compare the values of test statistics, t,
and critical value(s), tα or ± tα/2 Ttest falls outside the range of -2.145 to +2.145 Therefore Ho is rejected. |
Conclusion
that answer the initial question |
Ho is
rejected hence catapult A does not produce the same projectile distance as catapult
B. |
Compare your
conclusion with the conclusion from the other team members. What
inferences can you make from these comparisons? |
Dorson: Reject Ho, accept H1 with significance level of 5% Uzair: Reject Ho, accept H1 with significance level of 5% For Darius' conclusion, he is able to accept his Ho as his mean values for both fractional and full factorial are similar, therefore, the t value would fall within this tα range. Making his Ho acceptable. For Dorson's case, his case is similar to mine in a sense that the difference between our mean values is very significant. therefore making the t value large, not falling between the tα range. inference for significant level of 5% The standard deviation for my case is rather large and also the difference between the standard deviation between fractional and full factorial is very significant from 10.20 to 4.47. This may be due to uncontrollable factors. One uncontrollable factor is the human error. We can only measure the distance the projectile has travelled using a measuring tape. Different people were taking measurements and therefore the strategy for measuring the distance is also compromised as different people have different strategies. Another reason is due to the starting point of the catapult. Again, there might be different people handling the catapult and the starting point distance might vary depending on persons as different people have different principles of measurements. Therefore, this might affect the measured distance travelled and hence the mean and standard deviation of the design of experiments. |
Comments
Post a Comment